The Megalith excels at cleaning up armies/bases from afar. The range of this weapon, while not as much as the Fatboy's, is still great, matching the Monkeylord's Heavy Electron Bolters range. Combined, the damage equals that of Galactic Colossus. The Megalith's main weapons are two dual barreled Proton Cannons. The Megalith is also potent against battleships and destroyers, making it a must in shore defenses. It does gain 10 HP/s per veteran level though, like the other direct fire experimental units. It starts at 0.5 HP/s regeneration, unlike other direct fire experimental units which start at 10 HP/s. The Megalith will take a beating before going down. I sure as Hell ain't going back to correct anything, but I'll keep it in mind for the future, or well written articles.At 33750 mass and 110000 HP, the Megalith is the most costly amphibious or naval experimental in the game, and the heaviest experimental (in that it has the most HP). Lol about the "I find that 90% of the contributors here don't understand even the most basic formatting commands in MediaWiki", but it is kind of true. I don't think it's worth the effort to do that kind of editing on all the articles unless it can be done in some safe automated fashion. I find that 90% of the contributors here don't understand even the most basic formatting commands in MediaWiki. Basically, the important part is readability and clarity of where the link will take the user.įinally, I'd prefer all links to nicknames to be italicized, but I don't think it's a particularly important standard. Not everyone is going to know that the UEF one is called the Hummingbird, so it makes more sense to say UEF T1 Air Scout, or possibly the UEF version. But consider an article comparing the T1 air scouts of the three factions. When discussing the various Aeon experimentals, the context implies the Aeon and Experimental parts of the link words, so it would be redundant to say Aeon Experimental Sacred Assault Bot every time. Me, I don't think we should set a standard because it depends upon the context. As for whether the link words should say the full name or the nickna Let contributors type whatever's easiest. I don't think there should be a standard for whether you link to the full name, official nickname or abbreviation because the nickname gets redirected to the full name anyway. What do you think? -Unsigned comment by Happypal There's three parts to this: What to link to ( Galactic Colossus, Galactic Colossus or Galactic Colossus), what the link words say ( GC, Galactic Colossus or Aeon Experimental Sacred Assault Bot), and how the link words are formatted ( Galactic Colossus or Galactic Colossus). I used the always italic nickname for both the pillar and the Megalith. I realize there is not really a standard, but I think we might as well make one. However, do we write it in italics? Or do we do this only for the current unit on this page? or something else? This is kind of important: How do we refer to units in articles? As far as I know, nickname is the way to go. TaviRider 05:42, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Referencing units in articles I've learned over the past few days that the mod community needs a wiki even more than regular SupCom players. When I wrote that, I had the mistaken impression that there was already plenty of reference information provided by GPG. I wholeheartedly agree that this needs to be removed. I think that needs to be edited (What the Supreme Commander Wiki is not.)Ĭan you elaborate on how we should edit it? - FngKestrel 03:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC) It says that this is not a MOD creation reference. TaviRider 14:17, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Modding / Mapping Reference If you have this information, feel free to add it. There's also some undocumented commands that should go into an article. There's already an article specifically about ferrying, which is one of the most complex commands in the game. (Unsigned comment by User:Msquare at 05:38, 29 March 2007)Ībsolutely. the Hold-right-mouse-down and left-click for formations). Should this also contain a Complete Command Reference? Apart from repeating the content of the F12 list, it should describe the various mouse clicks (f.ex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |